CrowdAI was a San Francisco-based computer vision company founded in 2016 by Devaki Raj, Nicolas Borensztein, and Pablo Garcia. The company began as a hybrid human-and-machine image annotation service for satellite, drone, and autonomous vehicle imagery, then pivoted in 2021 to a no-code platform covering the full vision AI lifecycle — data labeling, model training, and deployment. Over seven years, CrowdAI raised $18.3 million, built deep relationships with the U.S. Department of Defense, and served customers including the Air Force, Navy, and National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency. The company did not fail in the conventional sense. It was acquired by Saab, Inc. — the U.S. subsidiary of Swedish defense contractor Saab AB — on August 30, 2023. The core thesis of this report is that CrowdAI achieved a legitimate but likely modest exit: its defense concentration provided durable revenue and a credible acquirer, but also capped its growth ceiling, limited VC appetite, and prevented the company from scaling into the venture-scale outcome its no-code platform ambitions implied.
CrowdAI was founded in June 2016 by three operators who had each, in different ways, run directly into the wall that training data creates for machine learning systems.
Devaki Raj, who became CEO, studied Biological Sciences and Statistics at the University of Oxford before joining Google as a data scientist in the company's energy division.[1] [2] Pablo Garcia, who became a co-founder, also spent four years at Google, where both he and Raj observed firsthand how data about the physical world is collected and used to train machine learning models.[3] Nicolas Borensztein, who became CTO, came from a different angle: his prior startup, Ember, focused on efficiency for digital advertising and hit the training data problem directly. "We were all really motivated to get involved in this new wave of AI and think about how we can solve this computer vision problem," Borensztein said.[4]
The three founders — Google, Oxford, and UC Berkeley alumni — applied to Y Combinator's Summer 2016 batch with an initial idea that had nothing to do with imagery.[5] Their first concept was speech-to-text transcription software for doctors. YC partner and COO Qasar Younis pushed back: hospital sales cycles would be too slow to generate the early revenue YC demands of its companies.[6] The founders pivoted quickly to the problem they knew best — the bottleneck of annotating visual data for machine learning — and reoriented around satellite, drone, and autonomous vehicle imagery.
The pivot proved prescient. Autonomous vehicle companies like Cruise Automation were generating enormous volumes of camera footage that needed to be labeled before it could train a self-driving model. Satellite operators like Planet Labs were capturing more imagery of the Earth's surface than any human workforce could manually process. The founders' insight was that machine learning could handle the majority of annotation automatically, with humans reviewing only the cases the algorithm was uncertain about.

YC's influence on the company's operating philosophy was lasting. Raj later credited the program with instilling a revenue-first discipline that shaped CrowdAI's entire trajectory: "YC beats it over your head: Make revenue, make revenue, make revenue. It helped structure our thinking in a way that we could build a financially sustainable company."[7]

CrowdAI emerged from Demo Day in August 2016 with early customers already in hand, named by TechCrunch as one of the top companies in the S16 batch. The founding team's combination of enterprise credibility, direct experience with the problem, and willingness to pivot on advisor feedback gave the company an unusually strong start for a seed-stage AI startup.

CrowdAI's product went through two distinct phases over its seven-year life. The core problem it addressed throughout both phases was the same: visual data — satellite images, drone footage, security camera feeds, manufacturing inspection video — is only useful to a machine learning model after a human has labeled what's in it. That labeling process is slow, expensive, and a bottleneck for every organization trying to deploy computer vision at scale.
Version 1 (2016–2020): Hybrid Human-and-Machine Annotation
The original product combined machine learning with a managed human workforce to annotate imagery faster and cheaper than either approach alone. A customer would upload a batch of images — say, aerial photographs of a city — and CrowdAI's algorithms would automatically detect and label objects like roads, buildings, and vehicles in roughly 70% of the images without any human involvement.[20] The remaining 30% — cases where the model was uncertain — were routed to human annotators for review. The result was annotation that was faster than a purely human workflow and more accurate than a purely automated one.
The early product was purpose-built for three imagery types: satellite and aerial imagery (for geospatial analysis), drone footage (for infrastructure inspection and disaster response), and camera footage from autonomous vehicles (for training self-driving models). Customers like Cruise Automation used the service to label the camera data their vehicles collected. Planet Labs and Digital Globe used it to extract structured information from satellite imagery at a scale no human team could match.[21]
The technical architecture relied on deep learning models — built on frameworks including TensorFlow, Caffe, and Torch — trained on domain-specific imagery datasets. The key differentiator was not the annotation tooling itself but the pre-trained models for specific imagery types, which allowed the auto-annotation rate to be meaningfully higher than a generic labeling service.
Version 2 (2021–2023): No-Code Vision AI Platform
By 2021, CrowdAI had repositioned from an annotation service into a horizontal platform covering the full AI lifecycle. The no-code framing meant that a customer without a data science team — a property insurer, a manufacturing plant, a government agency — could upload imagery, label it using CrowdAI's tools, train a custom computer vision model, and deploy that model to analyze new imagery, all without writing code.[22]
The platform covered four stages: data labeling, model training, model scaling, and decision support.[23] A manufacturing customer, for example, could use it to train a model that detects defects on an assembly line from camera footage, then deploy that model to flag defects in real time. A government customer could use it to analyze satellite imagery for infrastructure damage after a natural disaster.

The pivot from services to platform was a meaningful architectural and go-to-market shift. It moved CrowdAI from a workflow that required ongoing human labor to one where the software itself was the product — a more scalable model, but one that required competing on product quality and distribution against better-capitalized rivals.
CrowdAI served two distinct customer segments across its lifetime.
The first was the commercial technology sector: autonomous vehicle companies (Cruise Automation, Udacity), satellite imagery operators (Planet Labs, Digital Globe), and later manufacturing, property insurance, and financial services firms.[24] These customers needed computer vision capabilities but lacked the internal data science teams to build and maintain them.
The second — and ultimately dominant — segment was the U.S. government and defense community. By 2018, CrowdAI had become the first commercial computer vision vendor to support the DoD's Joint Artificial Intelligence Center (JAIC).[13] Over the following years, the customer list expanded to include the U.S. Air Force, U.S. Navy, and National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency.[25] The AFRL R&D agreement in February 2022 extended the relationship into research applications.[17] Government customers valued CrowdAI's security posture, its experience with classified and sensitive imagery, and its established track record with the JAIC — a combination that was difficult for newer entrants to replicate quickly.
The computer vision market that CrowdAI addressed was large and growing rapidly during its operating years. The broader AI training data market — which includes image annotation services — was estimated at approximately $1.2 billion in 2020 and projected to grow at a compound annual rate exceeding 25% through the mid-2020s, driven by the proliferation of autonomous systems, satellite constellations, and industrial automation. The no-code AI platform market, which CrowdAI entered with its 2021 pivot, was a subset of the broader MLOps and AutoML market, which analysts estimated at several billion dollars by 2022.
The defense AI market, where CrowdAI concentrated its government work, was a distinct and fast-growing segment. The DoD's AI budget grew substantially after the JAIC's founding in 2018, and the $249 million ceiling on the Blanket Purchase Agreement under which CrowdAI operated signals the scale of government spending in this area — though ceiling values represent maximum potential spend, not guaranteed contract value.[13]
CrowdAI competed in a market that became significantly more crowded and better-funded between 2016 and 2023.
In the annotation services segment, the primary competitor was Scale AI, founded in 2016 — the same year as CrowdAI. Scale AI raised $325 million and reached a $7.3 billion valuation by 2021, dwarfing CrowdAI's $18.3 million total raise.[26] Scale's capital advantage allowed it to build a larger human annotation workforce, invest more heavily in tooling, and pursue enterprise sales at a scale CrowdAI could not match. Other annotation competitors included Sama and iMerit, both of which built large offshore annotation workforces that competed on cost.
In the no-code vision AI platform segment, Roboflow emerged as a developer-focused competitor with strong bottom-up distribution — a go-to-market motion that CrowdAI, with its enterprise and government sales orientation, did not replicate. Robovision and alwaysAI competed in adjacent spaces.[26]
CrowdAI's defensible position was not in the commercial market, where it was outgunned on capital and distribution, but in the defense and intelligence community, where its JAIC credentials, security clearances, and established relationships created genuine barriers to entry. This concentration ultimately defined both the company's survival strategy and its exit.
CrowdAI operated as an enterprise software and services company throughout its life, with the revenue model evolving alongside the product.
In its first phase (2016–2020), the company charged for annotation services on a per-image or per-project basis, with pricing reflecting the complexity of the imagery type and the degree of human review required. Government contracts — structured as task orders under the JAIC's Blanket Purchase Agreement — provided a more predictable revenue stream than commercial project work.
After the 2021 pivot to a no-code platform, the model shifted toward software licensing or subscription fees for platform access, supplemented by professional services for implementation and customization. The government segment likely continued to generate revenue through multi-year contracts rather than self-serve subscriptions.
The company's YC-instilled emphasis on revenue generation appears to have kept it financially sustainable on modest capital — $18.3 million raised over seven years is unusually lean for an AI company that reached 47 employees and served the DoD.[9] Revenue figures were never publicly disclosed, making it impossible to assess the company's true scale or profitability at the time of acquisition.
CrowdAI's traction was real but concentrated, and the available metrics suggest a company that built genuine capability and credibility without achieving the scale its platform ambitions implied.
The most concrete technical proof point was the auto-annotation rate: by early 2017, CrowdAI's algorithms could annotate 70% or more of images without human assistance — a meaningful efficiency gain over purely manual workflows.[20] Early customers validated the core use case: Cruise Automation (autonomous vehicles), Udacity (self-driving car training data), and Planet Labs (satellite imagery) were all paying customers by the time of the January 2017 seed raise.[27]
The government traction was the company's most distinctive achievement. Becoming the first commercial computer vision vendor to support the JAIC at its 2018 inception — before the DoD's AI ambitions were widely understood — required both technical credibility and early relationship-building that few startups managed.[13] The subsequent selection under a $249 million-ceiling BPA, plus the AFRL R&D agreement and relationships with the Air Force, Navy, and NGA, confirmed that the government penetration was durable, not a one-off contract.[25]
The 200% customer base growth reported in the year prior to April 2021 is the most significant commercial traction signal, though the absolute base size is unknown.[15] The company grew from 8 employees in December 2017 to 47 by December 2021 — a 5x headcount increase over four years that suggests sustained revenue growth, though the pace was modest relative to well-funded competitors.[12] [9]
Disaster response use cases — wildfire mapping in California, Hurricane Harvey in Texas, Hurricane Michael in Florida, Hurricane Dorian — demonstrated real-world utility and generated press coverage that aided government sales.[28] Raj's testimony before the U.S. Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee on AI procurement governance positioned CrowdAI as a thought leader in the defense AI space — a credibility signal that likely influenced procurement decisions.
Recognition from Forbes AI 50, Inc. 30 Under 30, Forbes 30 Under 30, and VentureBeat's Women in AI award confirmed market awareness, though these signals also suggest a company better known for its story than its revenue scale.
CrowdAI did not fail — it was acquired. But the acquisition by Saab, Inc. for an undisclosed amount, after seven years of operation and only $18.3 million raised, likely represents a modest financial outcome relative to the ambitions of a company that made Forbes AI 50 and served the DoD. Understanding why CrowdAI ended as a defense contractor acquisition rather than an independent platform company requires examining the strategic choices and structural constraints that shaped its trajectory.
The single most consequential factor in CrowdAI's trajectory was its deepening concentration in the U.S. defense and intelligence market. The JAIC partnership, established in 2018, was a genuine competitive achievement — but it set the company on a path that diverged from the commercial AI market in ways that proved difficult to reverse.
Government contracts provided stable, multi-year revenue that allowed CrowdAI to survive on $18.3 million in total funding while reaching 47 employees. But that same stability reduced urgency around commercial growth. By the time of the April 2021 Series A, the customer base was growing 200% year-over-year, but the company's identity — and likely its revenue concentration — was anchored in defense.[15]
Defense concentration also limited VC appetite. Traditional venture investors are reluctant to back companies whose primary customers are government agencies: sales cycles are long (often 12–24 months), contract vehicles are complex, and the path to a large commercial exit is unclear. The Series A of $6.25 million — small for a company with DoD relationships and triple-digit customer growth — likely reflects this dynamic.[29] The company attempted to address this by broadening into manufacturing, property insurance, and financial services with the no-code platform, but the commercial pivot came late and was underfunded relative to the competition.
The defense concentration ultimately resolved itself through acquisition: Saab, Inc. acquired CrowdAI precisely because of its DoD relationships and JAIC credentials, not despite them. Raj's post-acquisition statement — "dual-use technological advancement that aligns with the DoD's priorities" — confirms that defense was the primary value driver at exit.[19]
CrowdAI's 2021 pivot to a no-code vision AI platform was strategically sound — the annotation services market was commoditizing rapidly, and a platform model offered better margins and scalability. But the pivot required competing against companies with dramatically more capital.
Scale AI raised $325 million and reached a $7.3 billion valuation during the same period CrowdAI was operating on $18.3 million total.[26] Scale's capital allowed it to build a larger annotation workforce, invest in enterprise sales infrastructure, and pursue the autonomous vehicle and government markets simultaneously. Roboflow, competing in the no-code computer vision space, built developer-focused distribution that CrowdAI — with its enterprise and government sales motion — did not replicate.
The four-year gap between the $2 million seed in January 2017 and the $6.25 million Series A in April 2021 is the clearest signal of the capitalization challenge.[27] [15] During those four years, Scale AI raised hundreds of millions of dollars and established itself as the dominant player in AI training data. CrowdAI survived on government contract revenue and two undocumented intermediate rounds — but it emerged from that period as a niche player in a market that had consolidated around a well-funded leader.
The Series A itself — $6.25 million led by Threshold Ventures — was insufficient to fund the commercial expansion the no-code platform required. Building self-serve distribution, developer marketing, and a sales team capable of competing in manufacturing and insurance while simultaneously maintaining government relationships would have required significantly more capital than CrowdAI raised in total.
The pivot to a no-code platform was announced in April 2021 — the same year that Roboflow was gaining significant developer traction and Scale AI was expanding beyond annotation into broader ML infrastructure. CrowdAI was entering a more competitive segment of the market at a moment when the competitive dynamics were already unfavorable.
The no-code framing was also a positioning challenge. "No-code" resonated with commercial buyers who lacked data science teams, but the defense and intelligence community — CrowdAI's core customer base — typically had technical staff and procurement processes that did not prioritize ease-of-use in the same way. The platform's value proposition was strongest in the commercial market CrowdAI was trying to enter, not the government market it already served.
There is no public evidence that the no-code platform achieved meaningful self-serve adoption. The company's go-to-market remained enterprise and government sales-driven through the acquisition, suggesting the platform never developed the bottom-up distribution that would have been necessary for venture-scale growth.
Devaki Raj's Senate testimony on AI procurement governance and her extensive public profile — Forbes AI 50, Forbes 30 Under 30, VentureBeat Women in AI, Federal News Network interviews — positioned CrowdAI as a thought leader in defense AI. This visibility was valuable for government sales and likely contributed to the JAIC relationship and subsequent contracts.
But Senate testimony and award cycles consume significant CEO time. For a 47-person company competing against Scale AI in a rapidly evolving market, the opportunity cost of policy advocacy is real. There is no direct evidence that this trade-off was the wrong one — the government relationships it supported may have been the company's primary revenue driver — but it reflects a strategic choice to optimize for credibility and access rather than commercial growth velocity.
The Saab acquisition on August 30, 2023 resolved the tension between CrowdAI's defense concentration and its platform ambitions in the most logical way available: a defense contractor acquired the company for its government relationships and vision AI capabilities, not for its commercial platform potential.[19] Raj joined Saab as Chief Digital and AI Officer in a newly established San Diego strategy office — an acqui-hire structure that retained the founding team's expertise while integrating CrowdAI's technology into Saab's U.S. defense portfolio.
The undisclosed acquisition price makes it impossible to assess investor returns. Given $18.3 million in total funding and a seven-year operating history, the outcome was likely a positive but modest return for early investors — not the venture-scale exit that Forbes AI 50 recognition might have implied.
Revenue-first discipline enables survival but can constrain scale. Raj credited YC's emphasis on revenue generation with making CrowdAI financially sustainable on modest capital.[7] That discipline kept the company alive through a four-year gap between funding rounds. But it also meant the company optimized for sustainability over growth at moments when aggressive investment in distribution might have built the commercial scale needed for a larger exit.
Defense is a double-edged vertical for venture-backed startups. Government contracts provide stable, large-dollar revenue and create genuine barriers to entry through security clearances and procurement relationships. But they also limit VC appetite, slow sales cycles, and create acquirer concentration risk — the company becomes most attractive to defense contractors, not to the broad set of strategic acquirers or public market investors that generate venture-scale returns. CrowdAI's entire trajectory illustrates this dynamic: the JAIC relationship was both its greatest competitive achievement and the factor that most constrained its growth ceiling.
Platform pivots require capital proportional to the competitive intensity of the target market. CrowdAI's 2021 pivot from annotation services to a no-code platform was strategically correct — annotation was commoditizing and platform economics are superior. But the pivot was announced with $6.25 million in new capital into a market where Scale AI had raised $325 million.[15] Pivoting to a new market segment requires enough capital to build distribution, not just product.
Early customer concentration shapes long-term strategic options. CrowdAI's earliest customers — Cruise Automation, Planet Labs, and the DoD — were all in specialized, high-stakes imagery markets. That concentration built deep domain expertise and credibility, but it also meant the company's product, sales motion, and reputation were optimized for customers that were either acquired (Cruise by GM), commoditized (satellite imagery annotation), or government-constrained. Diversifying customer concentration earlier might have created more paths to a commercial-scale exit.
A 7-year independent run on $18.3M in a capital-intensive market is itself an achievement. CrowdAI operated for seven years, served Fortune 500 companies and the U.S. intelligence community, grew to 47 employees, and achieved a strategic acquisition — all on capital that most AI companies would have burned through in 18 months. The YC revenue discipline that Raj credited was real, and the outcome, while modest relative to the platform ambitions, represents a legitimate company-building achievement in a market that destroyed many better-funded competitors.