Overview
Sorted built software to help administrators discover company tools, see access and track subscription costs. YC lists it as a Copenhagen company founded in 2022, with a two-person team in Winter 2023. Its former founders are Adam Ingwersen and Frederik Ingwersen. The directory now marks Sorted inactive.[1]
Its surviving product page shows a more specific idea than a generic spending dashboard: employees installed a Chrome extension, and Sorted presented the tools, users and costs that administrators otherwise tracked manually. That page still invites early-access signups. Its existence documents the product's intended workflow; it does not establish an operating service today.[2]
Image 1 / 1
The useful rebuild question is how to turn incomplete software evidence into a decision a finance owner can defend. Public evidence does not establish why Sorted stopped operating. The product suggests a real tension: easy discovery attracts users, while reliable access and cost decisions require deeper evidence.
Founding Story
YC identifies Adam and Frederik as the founders. The surviving team page describes Adam as CEO with experience in economics, software engineering, data science and business operations. Frederik is described as CTO, with engineering work at Datamaga and All Gravy. These are the company's own biographies, rather than independent assessments of their skills.[3]
A founder post describes building the company in Chiang Mai before attending YC in San Francisco. The public record therefore does not support assuming the founders stayed in Copenhagen and never engaged publicly.[10]
That background fits a product spanning technical integrations and company administration. The team page also names design and advisory contributors. YC's team-size field should therefore not be treated as proof that exactly two people performed all work throughout the company's life. Nor does a sparse public record show that the founders lacked expertise or made no distribution effort.
Timeline
- 2022: Founded, according to YC.[1]
- Winter 2023: Participated in YC. The surviving site carries a 2023 footer and early-access positioning.[2]
- 2 October 2026: YC lists Sorted inactive. Its linked Webflow product, integration and team pages remain readable. The primary sources reviewed do not establish an operating shutdown date, acquisition or founder post-mortem.
What They Built
The product page explains a three-step workflow: sign up, install the Sorted Chrome extension, and let the product discover tools. It promises an overview of spending by tool, user and category, alongside access visibility. Browser discovery is a concrete mechanism; it is not evidence of complete billing coverage or the ability to revoke every account.[2]
The integration directory lists tools including Google Workspace, Slack, GitHub, Figma and Notion as supported and discoverable. Those labels document claimed coverage, not independent tests of permission scopes, seat billing or provisioning. A discoverable browser application and a fully managed application are different capabilities.[4]
This distinction matters for the rebuild. A transaction can show a charge without showing a user's activity. A login can show activity without showing whether a seat is billable. A repeated payment can suggest the next charge without establishing a contractual renewal date or cancellation deadline.
Market Position
Discovery, cost control and renewal work remain competitive. Torii currently advertises finance, identity, HR and browser signals, together with usage-based license decisions and contract renewal management. Its public materials address scale-up and enterprise customers. A new product cannot safely assume that finance-led discovery or card neutrality is an empty market.[5]
Ramp's current documentation also covers uploaded contracts, owners, contract-end dates, last dates to act, reminders and renewal approval workflows. Some actions depend on product access or its Procurement add-on. The practical comparison is the customer's existing workflow and access, rather than a blanket claim that Ramp's competing capability is free or shallow.[6]
A narrow entrant could test whether smaller finance teams need a portable review packet assembled from exports they already possess. That is a positioning hypothesis. It needs customer interviews and paid pilots before it becomes a defensibility claim.
Business Model
The company’s about page promises free service for companies just starting out.[9] Its surviving pricing page lists $0 per month for 0–8 employees, $50 for 8–50 employees and $250 for 50+ employees. These are the page’s displayed bands, including their overlapping boundaries. They document a free entry tier and paid growth tiers, not achieved revenue or current service availability.[11]
The reviewed primary sources do not establish Sorted's revenue, customer count, realized subscription payments, burn rate or follow-on funding. YC participation alone cannot supply those missing figures. YC's standard deal combines $125,000 for a fixed 7% with $375,000 on an uncapped most-favored-nation agreement; describing the full investment as exactly 7% omits part of the terms.[7]
No runway estimate or financing failure is needed to assess the product. The relevant commercial uncertainty is whether an administrator will pay for a decision workflow beyond the discovery already available in existing systems.
Post-Mortem
The cause of Sorted's inactive status remains unresolved. Category competition and integration maintenance are plausible pressures, but they are not documented causes of this company's outcome. Founder priorities, customer demand and financing cannot be ranked from the evidence reviewed.
One product risk is testable: discovery may reveal a possible expense without supplying enough information to act. Slack's presence method, for example, reports whether another user is currently active or away. It does not return a general 30-day utilization history or prove that a paid license is unnecessary.[8]
A rebuild should test the handoff from signal to verified decision. Require an owner to explain exceptions, distinguish potential reductions from realized savings, and use contract evidence for deadlines. If the packet still needs extensive manual correction, the product has moved work rather than removed it.
Key Lessons
- Separate discovery from control. Seeing an application does not establish its billable seats, contractual terms or access controls.
- Keep each evidence source within its limits. Spending, usage and contract documents answer different questions. Combine them without presenting guesses as facts.
- Investigate the operating outcome. An inactive catalogue status is useful; a precise causal story needs additional evidence.