
Mobile marketing analytics and infrastructure
Turn this teardown into a decision-ready prompt for ChatGPT, Claude, or your agent.
If you only have a few minutes to spare, here’s what investors, operators, and founders should know about Tenjin (S14).
Tenjin gave mobile app marketers one system for attribution, ad spend, revenue, retention and raw data. Founded by former Tapjoy contributors Christopher Farm and Amir Manji, it joined YC Summer 2014, launched in 2015 and raised $2.5 million in 2016.[1]
Its insight was that attribution alone did not answer the business question. Marketers needed to join acquisition cost with purchases, subscriptions and ad revenue, then inspect the raw records. Privacy changes later made that job harder and increased the value of explicit uncertainty. YC now labels Tenjin acquired, but the company remains active and no source names a buyer, date or terms.[2]
Christopher Farm and Amir Manji had worked on the growth of Tapjoy, an early mobile advertising and monetization platform. They saw app marketers assemble attribution, analytics, ad-network cost and internal warehouse data from separate vendors.[1]
Farm described the problem from direct experience: "We experienced first-hand how fragmented and messy the mobile marketing industry is, and how much app marketers struggle to access and organize the raw data." The company formed in 2014 and joined YC that summer. It launched publicly in August 2015.
The product thesis joined two ideas. First, attribution should connect an install to the campaign or network that drove it. Second, the customer should be able to query the underlying data rather than accept a fixed dashboard. Farm said: "Our goal is to help developers connect the digital dots in a user's lifecycle using a single service and platform."[1]
NetEase Capital led a $2.5 million round in June 2016, with earlier backing from YC, Lightbank and angel investors. Tenjin named Yelp, NaturalMotion, Playdots, N3twork and KLab among customers.[1]
Tenjin's attribution layer connected ad clicks and impressions to app installs. For ordinary networks, a tracking link carried campaign and click identifiers; the Tenjin SDK reported the install; the service matched the records and sent callbacks. Self-attributing networks such as Apple, Meta, Google and Snap returned their own attribution data.[4]
The dashboard combined acquisition cost with post-install behavior: purchases, subscriptions, ad revenue, retention and return on ad spend. That mattered for free-to-play apps, where a user could create value through advertising without making an in-app purchase.
DataVault made the infrastructure accessible. Customers could query joined tables for events, campaigns, networks, apps, country-level spend and daily ad revenue instead of exporting each system by hand.[5]
Privacy changes altered what could be known. With less granular iOS data after version 14.5, Tenjin used aggregated session-based revenue attribution and described it as a more conservative view that included users who opted out of advertising identifiers.[3] The current platform continues to combine deterministic signals, network reports and modeled aggregates.
Tenjin focused on mobile app developers, marketers and publishers, especially teams buying users across several ad networks but lacking a dedicated data engineering group.
No observed source gives a defensible serviceable-market estimate. Tenjin says it has supported more than 10,000 companies since 2014, but that figure is not independently audited.[6]
AppsFlyer, Adjust, Branch and Kochava compete as mobile measurement partners. Large app publishers can also build internal pipelines. Tenjin positioned itself around accessible pricing, ad-revenue attribution and direct warehouse access.
Read the complete post-mortem, the rebuild playbook, and the exact reasons Tenjin is still worth studying now.